<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Structure Deck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/</link>
	<description>YU-GI-OH Online Expert Player Information</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niblet</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Niblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I mean that strike will be in a deck recipe that you win from an npc (reward deck), not that you will get a strike as a present for dueling one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean that strike will be in a deck recipe that you win from an npc (reward deck), not that you will get a strike as a present for dueling one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronskull</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>ronskull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I dont know if strike could be a reward or not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if strike could be a reward or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niblet</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Niblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I just read on the main site about the reward decks. I think you're right. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read on the main site about the reward decks. I think you&#8217;re right. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: source0</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>source0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>I think its more likely these might be some of the npc reward decks, from the quotes Ive seen npcs use cards not in these decks.

Besides, think of it from a programmers/bandwidth point of view; why would the client side need to know whats in character decks ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its more likely these might be some of the npc reward decks, from the quotes Ive seen npcs use cards not in these decks.</p>
<p>Besides, think of it from a programmers/bandwidth point of view; why would the client side need to know whats in character decks ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niblet</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Niblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that these are the NPC's decks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that these are the NPC&#8217;s decks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverFox</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>omg strika str,, deck lol konami</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg strika str,, deck lol konami</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xXx</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>xXx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>ok thx for the information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok thx for the information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apocalypsmage</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>apocalypsmage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>lol well anyways, the second structure deck, besides from havong strike in it, has nearly all the most wanted pack cards there are... i wonder what come next ~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol well anyways, the second structure deck, besides from havong strike in it, has nearly all the most wanted pack cards there are&#8230; i wonder what come next ~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiritofsword</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>spiritofsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>2nd Trial 50 is just prediction from Japanese Site nothing confirm on data. (４月２４日(火)～
	　◆オンライン２周年記念イベントあり？(アニバ２とか)?) (if you read my Thai Blog and don't understand my language you may think it's confirm but it's not.)

All This Structure Deck and their names appear in Data It's mean Konami prepare to release it but they may change their mind also, Did you notice ARRIVAL OF THE 4 EMPERORS They use Emperror (Jpn) instead of Monarch (EN) and there is 1 Unknown card also that unknown card is a card they aren't release now so It's Future Structure Deck If konami didn't change their mind all this Structure Deck will release in a future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd Trial 50 is just prediction from Japanese Site nothing confirm on data. (４月２４日(火)～<br />
	　◆オンライン２周年記念イベントあり？(アニバ２とか)?) (if you read my Thai Blog and don&#8217;t understand my language you may think it&#8217;s confirm but it&#8217;s not.)</p>
<p>All This Structure Deck and their names appear in Data It&#8217;s mean Konami prepare to release it but they may change their mind also, Did you notice ARRIVAL OF THE 4 EMPERORS They use Emperror (Jpn) instead of Monarch (EN) and there is 1 Unknown card also that unknown card is a card they aren&#8217;t release now so It&#8217;s Future Structure Deck If konami didn&#8217;t change their mind all this Structure Deck will release in a future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xXx</title>
		<link>http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>xXx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duelevolution.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/future-structure-deck/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I think its only a Fake same with Trial50#2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its only a Fake same with Trial50#2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
